Trachtenberg has mentioned the goal was to tell a story through action, much like what George Miller did with 2015’s excellent Mad Max: Fury Road, and it shows. That was the secret sauce of the first two Predator films the (solo) franchise never really asked for a massive expansion of the core premise, and both Predators (2010) and The Predator (2018) struggled with the balancing act of bringing new ingredients to the table while keeping things simple.Ĭlocking in at around 100 minutes (including credits), Prey is lean and mean. That principle is tied to the idea of leaving fluff out of short stories, something screenwriter Patrick Aison took to heart while crafting the impressive script.Įvery blockbuster doesn’t need to be bloated with subplots, redundant characters, or convoluted mythology elements. Prey is filled with Chekhov’s guns - elements that appear to be unimportant at first but completely define how key scenes play out later. And of course, man is the most enticing prey. We simply see a Predator arriving on Earth and learning about the most dangerous animals he can hunt. ![]() The first 40 minutes largely play out like a straightforward survival, coming-of-age film. ![]() When a Predator visits Earth for the first time, a vicious game of cat and mouse begins between the two and plays over the course of an impressive monster feature that harnesses the spark of the first two films and then does its own thing both narratively and formally.Įven though Prey’s script is one of the sharpest and tightest for an action-adventure film in a while, Naru shares a fair amount of screentime with other members of her tribe, including her brother Taabe, played by newcomer Dakota Beavers, and mother Aruka (Michelle Thrush). Set in the Great Plains of North America in 1719, the film follows Naru (Amber Midthunder), a young Comanche woman trying to prove herself as a worthy warrior and hunter. Related: Exclusive: The hunter becomes the hunted in Marvel Comics 'Predator #1' relaunch Unsurprisingly, the cat got out of the bag before shooting even began, but that didn’t make its premise any less interesting for fans. Here is what the students were able to observe:ġ) Well-developed, sharp incisors for cutting.In fact, the original plan was to market the film (temporarily titled Skulls) as an original story up to a certain point close to its release - a strategy also followed by Prey director Dan Trachtenberg’s previous film, 10 Cloverfield Lane. The picture above is of the rabbit skull. Using their data, they were asked to determine whether the animal was an herbivore, omnivore or carnivore and whether the animal was prey, predator or possibly both. Using a chart in their science journals, students kept a list of what they noticed about each skull in the following categories: Incisors, Canines, Molars, Eye-placement, and Skull Size. Another option would be to use pictures of skulls instead, although that might not be as exciting for the kids. If my school doesn’t order the kit next year, I’ll probably sterilize those and use them instead. (This happened as I was setting them up…oops!) If these are not available through your school, I’m thinking that teachers might be able to get some skulls (on loan) from a local science museum or find their own if they are up for some hiking! My husband has a number of skulls that he has found while walking in the woods. The jaws are very fragile and if moved around the teeth will fall out. ![]() Surprisingly, the kids didn’t seem to mind this, as you can really see all the parts by laying the pieces on display. I placed them on trays, so that they were easy to view and then instructed students NOT to touch them. Our district ordered these through a new NY state elementary science kit program and they were all clean and sterilized. Next, I set up animal skulls (Mink, Skunk, Rabbit, Cat) for students to investigate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |